Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Privatization and Utility Regulation in Developing Countries: the Lessons So Far

Identifieur interne : 001C40 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001C39; suivant : 001C41

Privatization and Utility Regulation in Developing Countries: the Lessons So Far

Auteurs : P. Cook [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:7E787301D5CD14C082AA2E8DF2700AEC0E174E53

Abstract

The privatization of utilities has grown in developing countries in recent years. Privatization transactions for the utilities sector have accounted for over a third of all sales in developing countries since 1988. The introduction of privatization has not necessarily meant more competition. Consequently, utility privatization has led in many cases to the creation of regulatory structures that aim to protect consumers from monopoly abuse and to provide incentives to firms to maintain efficiency. Case studies drawing on examples from the telecommunications, electricity and water sectors indicate that creating effective regulation and a competitive environment is a difficult and slow process. The cases have shown that regulation rather than privatization achieved the largest gains. Similarly, although the variety of regulatory measures that have been introduced have made a difference, the most tangible benefits, particularly to consumers, result from the establishment of competition. The case studies have shown that privatization has preceded the development of effective regulation and competition. The development of regulatory structures is constrained by the capacity of governments to enforce regulatory rules and monitor contracts. Fostering conditions that encourage competition and lessen anti‐competitive behaviour by incumbents is a beneficial but slow process.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8292.00124


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Privatization and Utility Regulation in Developing Countries: the Lessons So Far</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cook, P" sort="Cook, P" uniqKey="Cook P" first="P." last="Cook">P. Cook</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7E787301D5CD14C082AA2E8DF2700AEC0E174E53</idno>
<date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/1467-8292.00124</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7E787301D5CD14C082AA2E8DF2700AEC0E174E53/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001612</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001565</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001620</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1370-4788:1999:Cook P:privatization:and:utility</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001C52</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001C40</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001C40</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Privatization and Utility Regulation in Developing Countries: the Lessons So Far</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cook, P" sort="Cook, P" uniqKey="Cook P" first="P." last="Cook">P. Cook</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement>
<region type="nation">Angleterre</region>
<region nuts="2" type="region">Grand Manchester</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1370-4788</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-8292</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1999-12">1999-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">70</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="549">549</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="587">587</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1370-4788</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">7E787301D5CD14C082AA2E8DF2700AEC0E174E53</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/1467-8292.00124</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">APCE124</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1370-4788</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The privatization of utilities has grown in developing countries in recent years. Privatization transactions for the utilities sector have accounted for over a third of all sales in developing countries since 1988. The introduction of privatization has not necessarily meant more competition. Consequently, utility privatization has led in many cases to the creation of regulatory structures that aim to protect consumers from monopoly abuse and to provide incentives to firms to maintain efficiency. Case studies drawing on examples from the telecommunications, electricity and water sectors indicate that creating effective regulation and a competitive environment is a difficult and slow process. The cases have shown that regulation rather than privatization achieved the largest gains. Similarly, although the variety of regulatory measures that have been introduced have made a difference, the most tangible benefits, particularly to consumers, result from the establishment of competition. The case studies have shown that privatization has preceded the development of effective regulation and competition. The development of regulatory structures is constrained by the capacity of governments to enforce regulatory rules and monitor contracts. Fostering conditions that encourage competition and lessen anti‐competitive behaviour by incumbents is a beneficial but slow process.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Angleterre</li>
<li>Grand Manchester</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Manchester</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université de Manchester</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<region name="Angleterre">
<name sortKey="Cook, P" sort="Cook, P" uniqKey="Cook P" first="P." last="Cook">P. Cook</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C40 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001C40 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:7E787301D5CD14C082AA2E8DF2700AEC0E174E53
   |texte=   Privatization and Utility Regulation in Developing Countries: the Lessons So Far
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024